Sep 14, 2021 | Post by: schamane No Comments

Collective Agreement 2 Of 2018

3. Please note that the effects of clause B.8.5.2.3 of Annex A of the new agreement are not very clear. We will have to clarify how this will be implemented. There are different ways of interpreting this paragraph. The amendments are intended to regulate the re-election of educators after leaving the system and to provide some financial relief, given that the current provision weighs on the country. The agreement will serve as a deterrent to perceived abuses of the system. The basic principle of the new agreement is that an educator who is reassessed after a break is always called in the notary entry code (notch minimum) of the salary range of the organization on which he/she is reassessed. A pedagogue with more than 6 years of continuous service at the post office receives 6 additional notches compared to the notch at least in force. The group (ATU-CTU), of which NAPTOSA is a member within the ELRC, only supported Collective Agreement 4 of 2018. The other two collective agreements were not supported, as they are both supposed to be a downward deviation from the existing rights of educators. Collective Agreement No. 2 of 2018 stipulates that an educator appointed after a break is always appointed according to the emergency code of the entry salary of the position to which he or she has been appointed.

Ms. Foca responded to the transition from temporary education and said the agreement was very explicit on the process to be undertaken for the suitability of an educator to be permanently changed. It wasn`t just the fact that they had worked for three months that led to tenure. First, there must be a vacancy and, if not, there must be a need for skills from that teacher. Some teachers at the time were only there to replace a sick teacher on maternity leave or for various other reasons. The process and categories have been explicitly explained. For the permanent passage, the obligation of probation was still there. Any other obligations have not been removed. The definition of a child was in line with criminal law – everyone over the age of 18 was an adult. In the case of a schoolboy over the age of 18, he would always be heard. That person would have the choice of being present through a third party or directly.. .

.

Comments are closed.